Showing posts with label social standards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social standards. Show all posts

Friday, 29 November 2019

Are you accidentally the most morally upright human?

We have both the right and responsibility to champion the causes which matter to us and the people under our duty of care (by design or fate). We have both the right and responsibility to take actions which help us survive, be fine or perhaps thrive, but not to the significant detriment of others for the insignificant or incremental gains for yourself and the people under your care.
How do you measure that?
There's always someone better off than you and always someone worse off than you.
If you have no headspace, no money and no time (not by choice), you are trying to survive. If you have any one of those things, you have hope. If you have any two of those things you are fine. If you (could choose) to have all of those things, you are thriving.
Know thy self. Get to know your shadow and stop lying to yourself. Stop being a victim, stop being a hero.
It is what it is, this too shall pass.

I was inspired to write this after watching this https://youtu.be/bounwXLkme4

Monday, 31 October 2016

Could your security levels influence your social leanings?

This post is dictated not typed I think I've stumbled across an explanation as to why maybe all the people a traditional conservative and younger people are contrition traditionally more liberal. Is it that all the people have a little more to lose because I've already worked very hard across the life and the idea of changing things mean that they stand to lose a bit more than someone who was younger but doesn't stand to lose much but stands to gain a lot. I think I've just thought of another level that drills down even further and maybe conservative is a bit more are traditional natural selection you should do it on your own it's up to you don't rely on other people as much for don't expect things from other people you just get in and do whatever it is that you want or need to do and the government should allow you to be able to do that while traditionally a Liberal or more left wing is hey let's help out other people that need a bit more assistance let's do things for people that they may struggle to do themselves and so on and so forth so is it possible that being older means in theory you're a little more secure in yourself you little more sure of your position in the world and life but are you younger person is still finding their way defeat still finding their voice and their identity so does that mean all the people are more about them as an individual while younger people are more about the greater good because we know in studies that when we're in times of trouble of crisis we don't push away other people were actually draw more people in we need other people to survive in an indie to thrive so maybe there's a reason why young people prefer looking after everyone because that's how they're thinking at the moment that's how they're inclined and that's their way of feeling secure or and surviving lol someone else is a bit older may not need that kind of reassurance in just go there I'll do it on my own I'm fine how are you and you should be as well so is that possible? Is that a interesting perspective on my baby all the people of more conservative and younger people are more liberal? It's just a theory.

Thursday, 8 September 2016

Why do old vote consecutive and young liberal?

Because older people have more to lose and would rather keep what they have than risk while young have nothing to lose,  everything to gain and a long future of possibilities.

Monday, 19 January 2015

Incest

My response.  To this article...  Am I right?  Am I wrong?  Probably both and neither.

http://mobile.news.com.au/lifestyle/relationships/genetic-sexual-attraction-18-year-old-woman-opens-up-about-marrying-her-father/story-fnet0gt3-1227188412830

Oh please...  Two consenting adults...  Was society not talking like this about gays 50 years ago (and shorter) have we not learnt,  just because you wouldn't do it,  doesn't mean others have to follow... Sure there are probably a lot of proven unhealthy psychological issues in play that are proven in many people,  but the act itself has nothing to do with us and by shaming people who are like this (who can't help it I suspect just like many other behaviors we have learnt to accept) just makes another skeleton in the closest for I suspect many many people. Would I do it?  god no!  Who's reading this would you?  Statistical no. But these people feel the way they do and in the western world...  If both parties are consenting, legal age,  and not hurting anyone by their choices,  then who are we to condemn?